Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731014›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2026

Integration of fairness-awareness into clinical language processing models.

Rawan Abulibdeh, Yihang Lin, Sepehr Ahmadi, Ervin Sejdić, Leo Anthony Celi, Qiuyi Zhao, Karen Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rawan AbulibdehDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1179-4201
Yihang LinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4741-0353
Sepehr AhmadiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ervin SejdićDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. esejdic@ieee.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-8298
Leo Anthony CeliLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-6626
Qiuyi ZhaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen TuNorth York General Hospital, North York, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEquitable deployment of clinical artificial intelligence systems requires consistent performance across diverse patient populations. However, race information in electronic health records is often missing/inconsistently documented, limiting the ability to construct representative cohorts or assess algorithmic bias. This study evaluates model performance and fairness in predicting race from clinical text.

methodsWe compared four transformer-based deep learning models with a hierarchical convolutional neural network designed to capture the multilevel structure of clinical narratives. A two-phase active learning framework guided annotation of a primary care database. A fairness-aware loss function was applied to mitigate disparities across racial groups. Each model was trained with and without fairness-aware optimization. Performance and equity were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and subgroup audits across race, sex, age, and their intersections.

resultsHere we show that the hierarchical convolutional neural network achieves higher accuracy and performance equity than transformer models (macro F1 = 98.4%). Fairness constraints enhance parity across most transformer architectures, but degrade hierarchical model performance and cause one clinical model to collapse toward majority predictions, demonstrating that fairness interventions are highly model dependent. Persistent disparities across race, sex, and age indicate that inequities reflect architectural limitations and systemic biases.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that fairness can be integrated into clinical language models, though effects vary by model type. Architectures aligned with clinical text structure inherently promote fairness, yet mixed fairness constraint outcomes highlight the need for tailored interventions. Persistent demographic disparities show that algorithmic bias often reflects upstream documentation inequities. This framework offers a scalable path toward equitable NLP for clinical artificial intelligence.

Identifiers

PMID41731014
PMCPMC13039359

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.