ArticleBMC health services research2026
Intermittent claudication services in England: insights from a freedom of information request.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-Procedural Safety Screening in Diagnostic Imaging Across England: A Freedom of Information Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral arterial disease (PAD), presenting as intermittent claudication (IC), affects 20% of adults over 60 years of age in the UK. Claudication reduces patients’ mobility, quality of life, and increases their risk of cardiovascular mortality. National guidelines recommend a holistic, multidisciplinary approach including supervised exercise therapy (SET), pharmacotherapy, and lifestyle modifications. However, clinicians raise concerns about inconsistent service provision across NHS England. Freedom of information requests (FOIR) have become an important tool for researchers to access government information and examine practices. This study aimed to explore the availability and structure of services for the management of patients with IC in England.
methodsA FOIR was distributed to NHS Trusts in England in January 2025. The request included questions about IC clinics, SET availability, staffing, access to lifestyle and psychological support, and the referral process to IC services. The questionnaire was piloted with vascular specialists and was refined before dissemination. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics in SPSS (v29).
resultsOf the 138 Trusts contacted, 124 (89.9%) responded, with 82 (66.2%) providing vascular services. Fewer than half (46.3%) offered dedicated claudication clinics, and only 29.3% provided structured SET programmes. Yet of these SET programmes, only 12.5% of were delivered in line with national guidelines. Most clinics were nurse-led, whereas most SET programmes were physiotherapy-led. Lifestyle support was limited: only 22% provided smoking cessation services internally, 25.6% offered dietetic support within the Trust, and just one Trust reported access to psychological services for PAD patients. Most Trusts (94%) used an electronic referral form, whereas only 34% had a specific vascular proforma.
conclusionThis FOIR highlights substantial regional variation and gaps in claudication service provision across England. Many Trusts do not consistently deliver care aligned with national clinical guidelines, particularly in offering SET and integrated lifestyle care. Future research should focus on bridging the gap between policy and practice, expanding access to evidence-based interventions, and ensuring equitable, holistic care pathways for patients with IC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.