ArticleMicrobiome2026
Enhancing the fiber degradation efficiency in dairy cattle rumen through engineered bacterial communities.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rumen functions as an anaerobic fermentation chamber, housing microorganisms with cellulolytic and proteolytic capabilities that facilitate feed utilization. Fiber-degrading bacteria possess the capability to enhance the productivity of cellulolytic feed. The application of omics technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the rumen microbiome. Determining microbial composition and functional patterns in the rumen does not equate to a comprehensive exploration of rumen microbial resources and their mechanisms of action. This study seeks to integrate high throughput 16S rRNA data with information on culturomics, cellulolytic activities, nutrition, and synthetic microbial communities (SynCom) engineering. The objective is to evaluate the relationship between rumen microbial activity and fiber utilization efficiency in cattle, ultimately aiming to develop a more powerful intervention strategy for the ruminant industry.
resultsThe enrichment culture with various carbon sources led to significant alterations in the composition and structure of rumen microbiota, particularly enhancing those associated with carbohydrate metabolism. Employing the culturomics methodology, 896 strains from 78 species (including 8 novel species) were isolated, resulting in a 10.1% isolation rate relative to the rumen bacterial community. Among them, 35 strains demonstrated boosted cellulose-degrading capability on plates, while 25 exhibited the ability to degrade hemicellulose as well. SynComs of these candidates were prepared based on the ratio observed in rumen microbiota exhibiting high cellulolytic performance. SynCom 3 improved the neutral detergent fiber degradation (NDFD) by 20.39% averagely. Additionally, both in vitro and in situ assessments indicated that the optimization of dose/strain in SynCom 3 significantly improved the in vitro NDFD by 20.56% and increased the in situ NDFD by 7.81%, along with the acidic detergent fiber (ADF, + 11.47%). Genomic analysis revealed that the SynCom 3 functioned well in fiber degradation through the synergistic action of key carbohydrate-active enzymes.
conclusionsThis study strengthens rumen microbiome research by integrating omics and SynCom engineering within a microbiota-bacteria-enzymes-genes framework, revealing the significance of enzymatic synergy in carbohydrate metabolism. The findings establish a framework for utilizing low-abundance microbes and engineering functional consortia, which are crucial for improving ruminant feed utilization and biomass conversion. Future research should investigate the transcriptomic profiles and the metabolic cross-feeding mechanisms of fiber-degrading strains in the rumen. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.