ArticleMedicine2026
Association between relative fat mass and increased prevalence of gallstone disease in American adults: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between relative fat mass (RFM) and the occurrence of gallstone disease (GSD) among American adults. A total of 15,560 adults were included. RFM, body mass index (BMI) and WC were taken into account. The receiver operating characteristic curve was utilized. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline were employed to examine the potential correlation between RFM and the incidence of GSD. A cohort of 7515 individuals with GSD was studied. RFM, BMI, and WC were significantly associated with an elevated incidence of GSD in women in the unadjusted and adjusted models. Specifically, for every 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in BMI, WC, and RFM, the odds of GSD increased by 69%, 71%, and 77% in women. Notably, RFM had a higher area under the curve value compared to BMI in women. Among women, the prevalence of GSD was associated with a higher prevalence among individuals in the highest RFM tertile than in the lowest tertile (OR = 3.08, 95% confidence interval: 2.13-4.47, P < .001). The application of restricted cubic spline regression demonstrated a linear relationship between RFM and the likelihood of GSD. Higher RFM is positively associated with a higher prevalence of GSD in American women. Compared to BMI, RFM demonstrates a stronger association with GSD and may serve as a more useful anthropometric indicator in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.