ArticleMedicine2026
Association between daily vital signs during radiotherapy and severe infection in cancer patients: A case-control study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe infection poses a major threat to cancer patients due to treatment-related immunosuppression. Early identification and timely intervention are essential to reducing infection-related mortality. This study investigated whether daily vital signs recorded during radiotherapy could predict severe infection. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of cancer patients who received radiotherapy between 2016 and 2022. Cases were patients who developed severe infection during radiotherapy, while controls completed radiotherapy without infection. Patients with over a 2-day interval between the last radiotherapy session and infection diagnosis were excluded. Included patients had ≥ 5 recorded daily vital-sign measurements. Collected data included demographics, vital signs, cancer type, treatments, comorbidities, and infection outcomes. Logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were used to assess predictive value. A total of 35 patients with severe infection and 200 controls were analyzed. Head and neck cancer and lung cancer were the most common cancer types in the infection group. Significant predictors included lower last systolic blood pressure (SBP), higher last heart rate (HR), an increased last shock index (SI, calculated as HR/SBP), and greater HR variability across the last 2 to 5 radiotherapy sessions. In multivariable models, last SI and HR variability remained independent predictors, with AUROC values ranging from 0.773 to 0.803. In cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, changes in HR, SBP, SI, and HR variability in the days preceding severe infection may serve as feasible, self-monitored indicators for early detection in outpatient or home settings. However, the relatively small number of infection events (n = 35) may limit the statistical robustness of our findings, and further validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.