ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Simulating the impact of recombination rate on genomic selection breeding outcomes.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recombination shuffles alleles during meiosis, driving genetic diversity and shaping the outcomes of breeding programs. By breaking the physical links between loci, recombination facilitates the creation of new allelic combinations that can be selected for to improve genetic gain. Increasing the recombination rate by methods such as genome editing has become a goal for accelerating breeding. However, the effect of increased recombination rate on a population scale on breeding programs is not fully understood. We therefore carried out simulations to determine the effect of recombination on genetic gain in a breeding program using phenotypic and genomic selection, respectively. We focused on how heritability, number of quantitative trait loci, recombination rate increase factor, marker density, and training frequency affect breeding success. We also tested whether it is possible to use historic training sets without changes in recombination rate and merge the pre and postrecombination populations to improve prediction accuracy and genetic gain in genomic selection. We found that increasing recombination is particularly beneficial for highly quantitative traits with low heritability. However, with genomic selection, increasing recombination requires a higher training frequency as well as an increased marker density to accelerate superiority over phenotypic selection in terms of genetic gain. Furthermore, our simulations show that maintenance of old training sets and merging of training sets with different recombination rates is possible, but a decrease in prediction accuracy is expected, favoring frequent training and high marker density under increased recombination rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.