Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732086›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Simulating the impact of recombination rate on genomic selection breeding outcomes.

Zsa Zsa Boyny, Nicholas Lester, Karen Massel, Owen Powell, Rod J Snowdon, Sven E Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zsa Zsa BoynyDepartment of Plant Breeding, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Hesse, Germany.
Nicholas LesterQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Karen MasselQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9948-2438
Owen PowellQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5131-4286
Rod J SnowdonDepartment of Plant Breeding, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Hesse, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5577-7616
Sven E WeberDepartment of Plant Breeding, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 35392, Hesse, Germany.

Funding

German Research SocietyInternational Research Training Group 2843 "Accelerating Crop Genetic Gain"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombination shuffles alleles during meiosis, driving genetic diversity and shaping the outcomes of breeding programs. By breaking the physical links between loci, recombination facilitates the creation of new allelic combinations that can be selected for to improve genetic gain. Increasing the recombination rate by methods such as genome editing has become a goal for accelerating breeding. However, the effect of increased recombination rate on a population scale on breeding programs is not fully understood. We therefore carried out simulations to determine the effect of recombination on genetic gain in a breeding program using phenotypic and genomic selection, respectively. We focused on how heritability, number of quantitative trait loci, recombination rate increase factor, marker density, and training frequency affect breeding success. We also tested whether it is possible to use historic training sets without changes in recombination rate and merge the pre and postrecombination populations to improve prediction accuracy and genetic gain in genomic selection. We found that increasing recombination is particularly beneficial for highly quantitative traits with low heritability. However, with genomic selection, increasing recombination requires a higher training frequency as well as an increased marker density to accelerate superiority over phenotypic selection in terms of genetic gain. Furthermore, our simulations show that maintenance of old training sets and merging of training sets with different recombination rates is possible, but a decrease in prediction accuracy is expected, favoring frequent training and high marker density under increased recombination rates.

Indexed as

BreedingGenomicsModels, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticComputer SimulationPhenotypeQuantitative Trait Lociintrachromosomal recombinationplant breeding simulationsquantitative genetics

Identifiers

PMID41732086
PMCPMC13148392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.