ArticleDigital health
Wellness-enhanced contingency management for stimulant use: A formative qualitative study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the current study was to describe the initial stages of co-designing a smartphone app that delivers wellness-enhanced contingency management (WECM) to individuals with stimulant use disorder (StUD). WECM integrates the principles of contingency management with a Wellness Model that helps individuals build self-directed wellness habits to sustain long-term recovery. Method: In collaboration with a Community Advisory Board, interviews and focus groups with individuals with lived experience were conducted to collect information about smartphone access, comfort with technology, experiences with health-related smartphone apps and financial incentives, as well as the perceived feasibility and acceptability of the WECM app. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted to characterize the obtained data. Results: Outcomes from interviews and focus groups indicated that some individuals faced barriers related to smartphones and had varied experience using smartphone apps to support their health/wellness and substance use recovery. Overall, participant feedback on the feasibility and acceptability of the three core features of the WECM app: (1) wellness psychoeducation, (2) financial incentives for healthy habits, and (3) financial incentives for stimulant abstinence, was positive. Conclusion: Findings from the current study and valuable input provided by CAB members are presently being used to inform the design of the WECM app to ensure it meets the needs of individuals with StUD. This study adds to the limited research employing a co-production model in the development of CM interventions and serves as a preliminary step toward our long-term goal of co-producing a WECM smartphone app for StUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.