ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Progestogen use and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Cerebral Meningioma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Medical Treatment for Endometriosis: One Size Does Not Fit All.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumours in adults. Concerns have emerged about a possible link between progestogen use and intracranial meningioma; we assessed this association. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, EPI-PHARE database (from inception up to November 01, 2025), pharmacovigilance reports, and backward snowballing. Eligible publications were English or French epidemiological studies, reporting associations between progestogens and intracranial meningiomas. We excluded non-original reports, abstracts-only, and studies without eligible progestogen exposure or meningioma outcomes. We extracted summary data from published reports. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence with GRADE. The primary outcome was intracranial meningioma. Secondary outcomes were malignancy, location, and regression. Random-effects models were used, and heterogeneity was assessed with I Findings: Of 542 records screened, 78 studies were included in the review, and 14 high-quality observational studies in meta-analysis; all 14 were NOS high quality, although residual confounding and potential outcome misclassification cannot be excluded. Cyproterone acetate (CPA) was associated with increased meningioma risk (5 studies; 1047 exposed; pooled-OR 12.36 (95% CI: 7.47-20.45); I Interpretation: The certainty of evidence was limited by the observational design, residual confounding, heterogeneity, and imprecision for some exposures. Use of specific progestogens, particularly high dose macroprogestogens may be associated with an increased risk of intracranial meningioma. Transparent patient information and careful clinical and, where appropriate, imaging follow-up are essential. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.