ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Towards optimized rehabilitation with regenerative therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of cell-based injections for knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis meta-analysis aimed to determine the effects of intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based injections on both subjective and objective measures of pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The secondary purpose was to investigate how injection procedures, patient characteristics and post-injection rehabilitation influence outcomes.
methodsStudies published up to February 2025 were identified using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Embase, Web of Science and OpenGrey. Studies that investigated the effects of intra-articular MSC-based injections on improving outcomes for patients with knee OA compared to control conditions were included in this analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction, and disagreements were settled through a third author.
resultsThirty-three studies qualified for analysis. Multi-level meta-analysis revealed that MSC-based injections were more effective than controls for improving subjective pain (effect size [ES] = 1.03, p < 0.001) and function (ES = 0.79, p < 0.001). These effects increased with time post-injection (both p < 0.001). Few objective measures of knee function were reported. Meta-analysis revealed no significant effect of MSC-based injections for improving knee flexion range of motion (ES = 0.76, p = 0.166). Follow-up exploratory analyses of moderator variables suggest that non-weightbearing (p = 0.022) and exercise (p = 0.001) may increase the effects of MSC-based injections for improving subjective pain and function, respectively, and that patients who are male (p = 0.049), have a greater BMI (p = 0.047), and have less severe OA (p = 0.029) may demonstrate greater improvements in subjective pain following MSC-based injections.
conclusionsIntra-articular MSC-based injections may improve subjective pain and symptoms for patients with knee OA. However, the subjective improvements may not translate to improved objective knee function. Future studies should investigate the effects of MSC-based injections on objective knee function and how post-injection rehabilitation and patient characteristics augment the effects of MSC-based injections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.