Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41733603›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026

Association between Live Dietary Microbes and Root Caries: A Cross-Sectional Study with a Predictive Risk Model.

Donglei Wu, Zhengshen Lin, Peng Zhou, Hongxia You, Weixuan Chen, Yuyan Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Donglei Wu
Zhengshen Lin
Peng Zhou
Hongxia You
Weixuan Chen
Yuyan Zheng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the association between medium‑to‑high (MedHi) levels of live dietary microbe intake and the prevalence of root caries, and to develop a predictive model for estimating root caries risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This cross‑sectional study analysed data from participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2020. Dietary intake was assessed using 24‑h dietary recalls, and root caries status was determined via standardised oral examinations. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with root caries, including live dietary microbe intake. Participants were randomly divided into training and testing data sets. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to construct a predictive model, which was visualised using a nomogram and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots.

resultsAmong 7,839 participants, MedHi live dietary microbe intake, age, education level, smoking status, dental floss frequency, and systemic conditions were significantly associated with root caries (P 0.05). The predictive model incorporating these variables demonstrated good discrimination and calibration in both the training and testing data sets.

conclusionHigher intake of live dietary microbes was associated with a lower prevalence of root caries. Although the cross‑sectional design precludes causal inference, the findings suggest a potential link between dietary microbes and oral health. The proposed model may aid clinicians in identifying individuals at high risk and in developing targeted preventive strategies.

Indexed as

DietRoot CariesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscross-sectional studydietary habitsepidemiologylive dietary microbesoral biofilmsroot caries

Identifiers

PMID41733603
PMCPMC12933191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.