Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41733782›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2026

Can Cuticular Hydrocarbons Be used as Chemotaxonomic Tool for Neosilba McAlpine (Diptera: Lonchaeidae)?

Jean Carlos Dos Santos Lima, Laura Jane Gisloti, Sidnei Eduardo Lima-Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean Carlos Dos Santos LimaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, Brazil. jecarloslima@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3778-9474
Laura Jane GislotiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-0245
Sidnei Eduardo Lima-JuniorCentro de Estudos em Recursos Naturais, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Dourados, MS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7906-9737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown an interest in the Neosilba McAlpine (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) genus, as its larvae are reported to feed on many commercially relevant fruits. However, the taxonomical difficulty to identify the species of this genus apart ends up hampering and discouraging research on these flies. In this work, cuticular hydrocarbons were extracted, identified, and evaluated as chemotaxonomic characters from six species of adult Neosilba lance flies. We also investigated whether the fruits used by these flies as larval nutrition substrates influence the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles expressed by these flies. Forty-one hydrocarbon components were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The components represented four classes: n-alkanes, monomethyl alkanes, dimethyl alkanes and alkenes. Cuticular hydrocarbon analysis does not provide a reliable method to differentiate Neosilba species. The CHC components were overall common but the blend ratios differed even within Neosilba species. Cuticular hydrocarbon mixtures show host fruit-associated variation. The expression of cuticular hydrocarbons dependent on host fruit found in this study may suggest the formation of host race.

Indexed as

DipteraHydrocarbonsAnimalsFruitGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryLarvaHydrocarbonsChemotaxonomyFruit fliesLance fliesSurface lipidsTephritoidea

Identifiers

PMID41733782
PMCPMC12932378

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.