Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41733829›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2026

Taiwan Academy of Tumor Ablation (TATA) consensus on hepatocellular carcinoma ablation.

Ching-Wei Chang, Ming-Shun Wu, Wei-Yu Kao, Ming-Feng Chiang, Shih-Jer Hsu, Shen-Yung Wang, Chao-Hung Hung, Chih Horng Wu, San-Chi Chen, Yu-Ming Cheng and 11 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Risk Group Stratification for True Early Recurrence After Ablation for Hepatomas.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Ching-Wei ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Shun WuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Yu KaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Feng ChiangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan.
Shih-Jer HsuDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shen-Yung WangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Hung HungDivision of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chih Horng WuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Hepatitis Research Center and Center of Minimal-Invasive Interventional Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
San-Chi ChenDepartment of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Ming ChengDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
I-Cheng LeeSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Chung HsiehDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wei-Ting ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chen-Chun LinCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Po-Chin LiangDepartments of Medical Imaging and Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jen-I HwangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shi-Ming LinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kai-Wen HuangDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Yen DaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsiang HuangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Chi WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation; School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. wangchiachi888@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks sixth in incidence and third in mortality worldwide, underscoring its public health burden. Ablation therapy is one of the curative treatments for early-stage HCC. With recent advances in systemic therapy, combining ablation with other modalities has demonstrated improved outcomes and has extended applicability to selected patients with intermediate and advanced disease. In parallel, ablation technologies have advanced considerably. The introduction of next-generation microwave devices, multi-needle systems, and high-power generators has enabled the creation of larger and more predictable ablation zones. Non-thermal modalities have expanded treatment options for tumors located near bile ducts or major vessels, where thermal injury risk is high. Additionally, automatic fusion imaging has improved detection and targeting of inconspicuous or small lesions, thereby enhancing precision and safety. These developments highlight the need for updated treatment guidelines that reflect contemporary clinical practice. The guideline described herein, initiated by the Taiwan Academy of Tumor Ablation, was developed through collaboration among hepatology, surgery, radiology, and oncology experts. The process followed principles of evidence-based medicine and employed the Delphi method to reach consensus. In phase one, a systematic literature review and expert surveys informed preliminary recommendations, which were refined through online discussions. In phase two, structured voting with statistical analysis was performed to assess the consistency and strength of agreement. The final guideline provides detailed, evidence-based recommendations with explanatory notes. It incorporates emerging technologies, reflects recent clinical advances, and anticipates future trends, including the integration of artificial intelligence and automation into HCC ablation therapy.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesCarcinoma, HepatocellularCatheter AblationLiver NeoplasmsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMicrowavesTaiwanAblationConsensus guidelineHepatocellular carcinomaMicrowave ablationRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID41733829

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.