ArticleInnate immunity
Immune cells play a mediating role in the relationship between the gut microbiota and dementia: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Innate immunity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThe gut microbiota modulates dementia pathogenesis through immune interactions. Using Mendelian randomization, we investigate immune mediated mechanisms linking microbial dysbiosis to four dementia subtypes (Alzheimer's disease, Frontotemporal dementia, Vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease dementia . Our study tests whether gut microbiome effects on dementia are transmitted via immunoregulatory pathways.MethodsGenome wide association studies data included gut microbiota, 731 immune traits, and dementia cohorts (Alzheimer's disease, Frontotemporal dementia, Vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease dementia). Two step Mendelian randomization with Inverse Variance Weighted analyses assessed mediation effects, controlled by F-statistics >10 and Steiger filtering. Sensitivity analyses addressed pleiotropy
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.