ArticlePloS one2026
Brain activity and the production of written text during mediumistic trance: A controlled EEG study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mediumistic trance, studied as a cultural phenomenon, is considered an altered state of consciousness with dissociative and non-pathological characteristics. Studies on the effect of this trance state on linguistic performance using electroencephalography (EEG) are still scarce. We investigated the brain electrical activity of mediums using quantitative EEG (qEEG) during writing in waking and trance, and compared them with a matched control group performing simulated mediumistic writing and waking writing (n = 9 per group). EEG power differences exhibited increases across theta, alpha, beta1, and beta2 bands (p < .05) distinguishing activity during trance writing from the simulated mediumistic writing conditions. For the textual evaluations, within-group analyses showed that mediums' trance texts scored higher than their waking texts. In contrast, no significant intergroup differences in overall text quality emerged between mediums and controls. Together, these findings support the view that complex linguistic production is preserved across groups, while trance is associated with distinct spectral dynamics during writing in the mediums' group. Further research is warranted to refine the characterization of neural patterns supporting linguistic production in altered states of consciousness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.