ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning prediction of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: Emphasizing data imputation and feature selection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) is common among Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) patients. The coexistence of these conditions increases the risk of MAFLD progression and diabetes complications. Detecting MAFLD early is challenging due to its asymptomatic initial stages. In this study, we aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict MAFLD in T2DM patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study on 3,654 Iranian T2DM patients using their demographic and lab data. This study involved thorough data preprocessing, including evaluating various imputation methods on simulated missingness in a complete subset of the dataset. Additionally, four feature selection methods were applied to eight machine learning models to identify the most effective predictive model. The XGBoost classifier without feature selection achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 80.6% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 88.9%.Notably, certain features, such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), platelet count (PLT) and Vitamin D(VitD) influenced the predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.