Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734192›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A deep learning framework for gait-based frailty classification using inertial measurement units.

Arslan Amjad, Agnieszka Szczęsna, Monika Błaszczyszyn, Jerzy Sacha, Magdalena Sacha, Piotr Feusette, Wojciech Wolański, Mariusz Konieczny, Zbigniew Borysiuk, Basheir Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arslan AmjadDepartment of Computer Graphics, Vision and Digital Systems, Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6711-4382
Agnieszka SzczęsnaDepartment of Computer Graphics, Vision and Digital Systems, Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Monika BłaszczyszynDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
Jerzy SachaDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
Magdalena SachaDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Piotr FeusetteDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Wojciech WolańskiDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Mariusz KoniecznyDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7995-0882
Zbigniew BorysiukDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
Basheir KhanFaculty of Science, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty in older adults leads to heightened vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, significantly burdening individuals and society by increasing healthcare costs and dependency. To address this issue, an advanced frailty assessment method combining wearable sensors measurements with Deep Learning (DL) techniques is proposed to classify individuals into frail or non-frail stages. Wearable sensors provide real-time monitoring, facilitating early detection and timely interventions. Two diverse datasets, i.e., GSTRIDE and FRAILPOL, were utilized for enhanced frailty analysis, employing one to five Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors with varying configurations and mounting positions. A participant-centric data partitioning framework based on signal windows segmentation is proposed and applied to DL algorithms. Among the DL algorithms, InceptionTime outperformed, achieving 82% accuracy on GSTRIDE and 79% on the FRAILPOL dataset. Furthermore, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and evaluation metrics such as precision, recall, and F1-score confirm InceptionTime's effectiveness in classifying frail and non-frail stages by capturing spatio-temporal features from raw IMU signals.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFrailtyGaitAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID41734192
PMCPMC12931800

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.