ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Knowledge-based citation reasoning for biomedical domain.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCitation is central to scholarly communication, enabling researchers to navigate rapidly expanding literature and identify relevant prior work. Yet the 'reasoning' behind why a particular paper is cited is often implicit or opaque. Although academic search engines and literature tools rank candidate papers for a query, the motivations underlying these rankings are rarely transparent, making it difficult for scholars to interpret and act on retrieved results-especially in biomedical research where domain knowledge is essential.
resultsWe propose an encoder-decoder framework that leverages curated biomedical knowledge to generate 'explanations of citation motivation' in a structured bio-triplet format. We evaluate the approach against recent families of pre-trained language models for text generation, including BERT-style (and variants) and GPT-style (and variants) models. In cancer-focused experiments using PubMed Central, we annotate over 10 000 citation relations with bio-triplets grounded in curated knowledge from multiple biomedical databases. Trained on these annotations, our model outperforms strong sequence-generation baselines, improving precision, recall, and F1 for citation-motivation generation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data are available at Zenodo (archival DOI: 10.281/zenodo.14893445) and GitHub: https://github.com/zhongxiangboy/Knowledge-based-Citation-Reasoning-for-Biomedical-Domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.