Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
A randomised open-label pilot trial comparing mycophenolate mofetil with no immunosuppression in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (MINIMISE-Pilot).
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is routinely used in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) but not in limited cutaneous (lc)SSc. This may miss an opportunity to slow disease progression. MINIMISE-Pilot tested the feasibility of an open-label event-driven randomised trial of MMF vs no immunosuppression in lcSSc.
methodsWe tested the feasibility of a trial evaluating the impact of MMF on a novel event-driven composite endpoint. The MINIMISE endpoint measures time to worsening of lcSSc determined by progressive lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis, heart failure, severe gut involvement, major digital vascular complications or death. Prespecified 'Stop-Go' criteria were agreed. Subjects were stratified by ACA status.
resultsRecruitment was challenging. A total of 53 subjects were screened and 43 were randomised, 21 to the MMF arm. Since recruitment was <60 participants, MINIMISE-Pilot was terminated based upon the prespecified threshold for continuation. During the treatment period there were no clinical worsening endpoints. Adherence to MMF was generally high, with 19 participants (95%) being 100% adherent at week 1, decreasing to 9 participants (64%) at week 24.
conclusionMINIMISE-Pilot achieved its goal as a feasibility trial, leading to early termination of the study due to low recruitment. The rationale and concept for this study remain very strong. However, our findings suggest that a randomised prospective trial across 12 sites in the UK with relatively short follow-up duration is not feasible. This will inform the design of future studies testing the benefit of MMF in lcSSc.
trial registrationEudract (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/) 2019-004139-21.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.