Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734467›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of veterinary research2026

Evaluation of a point-of-care device for creatinine measurement in nonazotemic pigs presented to a referral hospital.

Jamie S F Lemus, Barbara Delvescovo, Elizabeth Williams Louie, Stephen Parry, Stephanie A Hon, Marta Cercone, Rebecca C McOnie

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamie S F LemusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Barbara DelvescovoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-8002
Elizabeth Williams LouieDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7910-8740
Stephen ParryCornell Statistical Consulting Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-8167
Stephanie A HonCenter for Animal Resources and Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Marta CerconeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-7927
Rebecca C McOnieDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-9735

Funding

Graduate Training Program in Comparative MedicineT32OD011000 · OD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda Marjorie DE MESTRE · 2012 to 2026
$5.7M
NIH HHS T32 OD011000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare creatinine concentrations measured using a point-of-care unit (Nova StatSensor; NSS) to those from a comparison method (CM) chemistry analyzer from pigs presented at a referral institution. Methods: A clinical prospective study was performed including 61 pigs admitted to Cornell Nemo Farm Animal Hospital for clinical reasons. Heparinized blood samples were obtained by venous aspiration, and whole-blood samples were obtained via ear prick. Creatinine concentrations were subsequently measured in triplicate on the NSS (on heparinized venous samples [NSSven] and ear prick samples [NSSear]) and compared to the CM. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. A Bland-Altman plot was graphed based on a linear mixed-effects model to estimate agreement between tests. Equivalence testing was performed. Results: NSSven (n = 110) and NSSear (71) from 61 nonazotemic pigs were analyzed. The mean creatinine ± SD was 1.3 ± 0.52 mg/dL from the CM, 1.1 ± 0.43 mg/dL from the NSSven, and 1.2 ± 0.42 mg/dL from the NSSear. Bias existed between average NSSven (-0.17 mg/dL) and NSSear (-0.21 mg/dL) and the CM. The 95% CI of the limit of agreement between the NSSven and CM was -0.88 to 0.54 and -1.04 to 0.62 between the NSSear and CM. The tests were not equivalent at 0.3 mg/dL. Conclusions: The NSSven, NSSear, and CM results are different and not equivalent in nonazotemic pigs. Clinical Relevance: The use of this device for screening of creatinine in pigs is discouraged based on the results in this population.

Indexed as

CreatininePoint-of-Care SystemsAnimalsFemaleHospitals, AnimalProspective StudiesSwineCreatininecompanion pigcreatininepoint-of-care unitrenal functionvascular access

Identifiers

PMID41734467
PMCPMC13282930

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.