ArticleCognition2026
A dynamic affective surprise signal influences episodic memory.
Article in Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enhanced memory for salient events can be driven by affective responses and by surprising outcomes. Recent work has suggested that deviations in expected feelings can influence decision making alongside a traditional learning signal, the reward prediction error. Whether a dynamic measure of "affective surprise" may serve as a learning signal that modulates the formation of lasting memories remains unclear. This study investigated how affective surprise elicited by dynamic changes in affective states influences long-term episodic memory. We introduce a novel computation for affective surprise informed by literature on prediction error-driven learning and derived from individual participants' continuous affect ratings of valence and arousal. We first reanalyzed a published dataset and then conducted an independent replication study in which participants encoded item sequences while listening to emotional music. Participants then re-listened to the music while providing continuous ratings of their felt affect. We assessed how affective surprise influenced different aspects of episodic memory after 24 h. We found that greater affective surprise at a given moment, or larger deviations from the recent history of ratings, enhanced memory for when an item occurred in a sequence. In contrast, we found inconsistent effects of affective surprise on item recognition memory across the two studies. Together, these findings suggest that affective surprise, regardless of direction, enhances the binding of items to their temporal contexts in memory. This work demonstrates that affective surprise, in particular valence-related surprise, might act as a learning signal with consequences for episodic memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.