ArticlePublic health2026
Disparities in testing for latent tuberculosis infection in a large US integrated healthcare system.
Article in Public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDisparities in latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) testing by birth country and socioeconomic status (SES) are not well understood. We used electronic health records from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (2010-2019) to examine disparities in LTBI testing across SES among those born in high-vs. low-tuberculosis (TB) incidence countries. STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study.
methodsWe examined LTBI testing rates and measures of disparities (absolute/relative concentration index, between-group variance, and mean log deviation) across area-level SES and racial/ethnic groups, by birth in a high-vs. low-TB incidence country, with imputed data for missing birth country.
resultsWe included 1,740,428 individuals, with a median age of 37.0 years (interquartile range 27.0, 51.0), who were 50.3% female (n = 875,879), and 39.2% Hispanic (n = 682,870); 1,205,853 (69.3%) were born in a country with low TB incidence. Among adults born in low-TB incidence countries (n = 1,205,853; 315.3 tests/10,000 person-years), testing rates remained stable (annual percent change [APC] = -0.69% [95% CI: -1.55, 0.41]). Among adults born in high-TB incidence countries (n = 534,575; 246.7 tests/10,000 person-years), testing rates increased over time (APC = 1.90% [1.14, 2.90]) with a higher rate of increase for those with higher SES. Among individuals born in a high-TB incidence country, disparities by SES and racial/ethnic groups increased over time.
conclusionsDisparities in LTBI testing in individuals born in high-vs. low-TB incidence countries decreased overall, but increased disproportionally in those with higher SES among those born in high-TB incidence countries. Continued research is needed to understand the causes of disparities, and to inform interventions to reduce disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.