ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2026
Delivery room cuddles for preterm infants in maternity centres of the UK: a national survey of practice.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis national survey aimed to evaluate the adoption and implementation of delivery room cuddles (DRC) for preterm infants (<32 weeks' gestation) in neonatal units across the UK. We sought to determine the extent of the practice, and understand the consistency and challenges associated with DRC, with the goal of enhancing care for preterm infants.
methodsBetween January and March 2024, all UK level 2 and 3 neonatal units were invited to complete a structured survey on DRC practices. We collected data on the existence, frequency and facilitation of DRC, as well as any institutional guidelines and barriers for its practice.
resultsWe received complete responses from all 131 centres invited (100% response rate). Among these, 60 centres (45.8%) reported routinely practising DRC, 66 (50.4%) did so occasionally and 5 (3.8%) reported not practising DRC at all. Notably, 81 centres (61.8%) practised DRC without formal institutional guidelines. Main barriers to practice included equipment limitations, varying staff attitudes, and concerns about the clinical condition of preterm infants.
conclusionThis survey demonstrates an encouraging high uptake of DRC in recent years, typically offered after initial stabilisation (within 30-60 min post-birth). Despite the recognised benefits of DRC to parents and in enhancing neonatal outcomes, considerable variability remains in its implementation underscoring the need for comprehensive guidelines and professional training. These could standardise DRC practices across the UK, promoting more consistent and effective care for preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.