Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735006›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2026

Patient, family and clinician priorities for critical care research in Asia and Africa: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership using modified Delphi and nominal group techniques.

CCAA Priority Setting Partnership Steering group, Teddy Thaddeus Abonyo, Sumaiya Arfin, Diptesh Aryal, Abi Beane, Martina Borellini, Arjen M Dondorp, Emma Donley, Punam Gautam, Tiffany E Gooden and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

CCAA Priority Setting Partnership Steering group
Teddy Thaddeus AbonyoThe Aga Khan University Hospital Nairobi, Nairobi, Nairobi County, Kenya.
Sumaiya ArfinAmsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC),Amsterdam Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3733-9142
Diptesh AryalNepal Intensive Care Research Foundation (NICRF), Kathmandu, Central Development Region, Nepal.
Abi BeanePandemic Sciences Hub and Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK abi@nicslk.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-7670
Martina BorelliniDoctors with Africa CUAMM (Collegio Universitario Aspiranti e Medici Missionari), Iringa, United Republic of Tanzania.
Arjen M DondorpMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Emma DonleyAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Punam GautamHospital Operations, Nepal cancer hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tiffany E GoodenDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3905-5477
Toto GronlundNational Institute for Health Research, James Lind Alliance, Southampton, England, UK.
Rashan HaniffaPandemic Sciences Hub and Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Madiha HashmiZiauddin University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Poornima KavlekarPatient and Public Representative, on behalf of CCCG, Apollo Hospitals Group, Chennai, India.
Chamira KodippilyNational Intensive Care Surveillance - MORU (NICS-MORU), Network for Improving Critical Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Felix LimbaniLung Health Research Group, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi.
Srilekha MadhavPatient and Public Representative, on behalf of CCCG, Apollo Hospitals Group, Chennai, India.
Alupo MarthaDepartment of Nursing, Critical Care, Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH), Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.
Fatimah MohamadAnaesthesiology and Critical Care, International Islamic University Malaysia - Kuantan Campus, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.
Subhasish NayakDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, OD, India.
Ahmed NayeemCritical Care Research Group, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Luigi PisaniMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Cornelius SendagireAnaesthesia & Critical Care, Makerere University, Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.
Roshni ShakyaResearch Coordinator, Nepal Intensive Care Research Foundation, Kathmandu, Central Development Region, Nepal.
Ayesha SiddiquiZiauddin University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi VijayaraghavanCritical Care, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1801-0667

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership aimed to identify and prioritise unanswered questions important to adult patients, their families and health professionals with lived experience of critical care across Asia and Africa.

methodsModified Delphi techniques were used to generate suggestions using an online survey. Following verification, literature review and content analysis, these suggestions were iteratively codified into emergent topics. Topics were presented in a second online survey for ranking, prior to an online workshop where nominal group technique was used to identify top priority questions across stakeholder groups. Surveys were disseminated using snowballing techniques.

findingsThe project was coordinated by a representative steering group independently overseen by the JLA. The initial survey generated 432 candidacy suggestions from 17 countries. Review, content analysis and codification resulted in 51 candidacy questions, spanning 16 topics. A second shortlisting survey reached 124 clinicians and 86 patient-carer stakeholders, who ranked the most important topics and produced a shortlist of 18 candidacy topic questions. Representative stakeholders attending an online workshop prioritised the questions, with a tie for 10th and 11th place, resulting in a top 10+1 priority list. These spanned four themes: cost of care, infection and long-term recovery including psychological and socio-economic recovery following critical illness.

interpretationCost, who would benefit from intensive care unit admission and organisation of healthcare dominated discussions irrespective of disease, injury or illness. Priorities were consistent between stakeholder groups. The JLA methodology enabled contributions from those with lived experience of critical care. The results of the prioritisation partnership provide a roadmap for researchers and funders seeking to address stakeholder priorities.

Indexed as

Critical CareFamilyHealth PersonnelHealth PrioritiesHealth Services ResearchAdultAfricaAsiaDelphi TechniqueHumansResearchGlobal HealthHealth economicsHealth services researchInterdisciplinary ResearchPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID41735006
PMCPMC12933803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.