ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
In-Depth characterization of the shared genetic architecture of suicide attempts with other major psychiatric disorders.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suicidality phenotypes reflect both shared and distinct genetic factors.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide is a significant public health problem that usually co-occurs with major psychiatric disorders. Suicidal behaviors have heritability of 30-50%, and the largest genome-wide association studies identified 12 loci linked to suicide attempts (SA). These findings indicate shared genetic architecture among SA and psychiatric disorders. We analyzed public GWAS summary statistics of SA, major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BIP), schizophrenia (SCZ), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to quantify genetic overlap using statistical genetics methods: MiXeR for polygenic overlap, LAVA for locus-specific genetic correlations, and HyPrColoc for multi-trait colocalization. MTAG and conditional false discovery rate (condFDR) identified SA- associated loci, while conjunctional false discovery rate (conjFDR) identified shared loci with psychiatric disorders. Additionally, we used polygenic risk scores (PRS) calculated in the UK Biobank to validate associations between genetic liabilities of psychiatric disorders and SA. SA involve approximately 6.9k (SD = 1.5k) risk variants with substantial overlap between psychiatric disorders, ranging from 53.2% with SCZ to 82.1% with BIP. Using MTAG, condFDR, and conjFDR, we identified 14 and 48 novel risk loci for SA, respectively. Through conjFDR, we identified 78 loci associated with SA and major psychiatric disorders, including one locus shared across all five traits. Genes linked to SA were enriched in synaptic components and signaling pathways. Despite significant genetic overlap, the SA PRS was the single strongest predictor of SA, followed by the MDD and ADHD PRS. The genetic overlap reflects potential common comorbidities complicating the identification of biological processes unique to SA, instead reflecting a complex genetic framework shared with psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.