ArticleScientific reports2026
Obstacle crossing when dual-tasking in children with and without developmental coordination disorder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the essential motor skills in children’s lives is obstacle crossing. This ability is frequently employed in everyday scenarios, such as stepping over toys or miscellaneous objects on the floor. In a real-life context, the execution of this task is often influenced by concurrent cognitive demands, leading to potential cognitive-motor interference. Its effect could be more apparent in younger children or children with some motor difficulties. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the obstacle crossing performance and post-obstacle movement under single and dual-task conditions (motor and visual discrimination task) in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and typically developing (TD) children of various ages. A total of 110 children aged from 7 to 12 years (35 DCD, 75 TD) participated in the study. They performed obstacle crossing task under single and two dual-task conditions (simple, complex-inhibit). The results showed significant effect of group only for centre of pressure velocity in medial-lateral direction during post-obstacle stance phase with higher values (worse balance) in DCD children. In addition, children with DCD also showed later propulsion during dual-tasking compared with single locomotor task, while TD children had comparable values for both conditions. The effect of age was significant in all aspects of the task including obstacle crossing performance, landing, dynamic balance and propulsion. Older children compared to younger can be characterized by a more effective strategy for obstacle crossing with smaller braking and faster gait initiation after obstacle crossing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.