ArticleScientific reports2026
A comparison of transient experiential wellbeing across health enhancing behaviours in the American Time Use Survey.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health-enhancing behaviours can support long-term subjective wellbeing. However, less research has examined experiential wellbeing (how people feel in the moment). By comparing experiential wellbeing during different health-enhancing behaviours, we could learn which dimensions of behaviours promote health. We included 11,144 participants from the American Time Use Survey who engaged in health-enhancing behaviours and reported levels of positive (happiness) and negative (sadness, stress, tiredness, pain) affect. Multilevel linear regression models tested how affect differed during eight behaviours. Social engagement was most common, followed by reading and physical activity. Attending sports events was least common. Pain and tiredness were higher during physical activity than other behaviours. Happiness was highest when doing receptive arts (attending performing arts, museums, watching dance, listening to music) and lowest when volunteering and reading. Results for sadness and stress were more variable. Activities that were done with others, outside the home, and that were very meaningful were associated with more positive and less negative affect. Overall, health-enhancing behaviours evoked complex emotional reactions, with positive and negative affect experienced simultaneously. Recommendations around health-enhancing leisure activities in Western countries focus on physical activity, but our findings support calls to include more activities alongside guidance on the context in which people engage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.