Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735539›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2026

Impact of lithotomy position on ureteral course and psoas muscle: a combined survey and radiological evaluation by the EAU Endourology & YAU Endourology working groups.

Tarik Emre Sener, Naif Dinc Ulker, Turker Altuntas, Ersin Gokmen, Arman Tsaturyan, Amelia Pietropaolo, Begona Ballesta Martinez, Oriol Angerri, Andreas Skolarikos, Bhaskar Kumar Somani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tarik Emre SenerSchool of Medicine, Department of Urology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. dr.emresener@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7680
Naif Dinc UlkerSchool of Medicine, Department of Urology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7205-0275
Turker AltuntasSchool of Medicine, Department of Urology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-250X
Ersin GokmenSchool of Medicine, Department of Urology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9845-163X
Arman TsaturyanErebuni Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3903-8060
Amelia PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-3108
Begona Ballesta MartinezHospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Elche, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-0545
Oriol AngerriFundació Puigvert, Department of Urology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-6585
Andreas SkolarikosDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-6628
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-3803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTo assess urologists’ perspectives on the impact of lithotomy position on the psoas muscle and ureteral course, and to radiologically evaluate these anatomical changes using a double J (DJ) stent as a marker.

methodsA prospective study was conducted between January and June 2025. An 11-item web-based survey was distributed to fellowship-trained endourologists to explore perceptions regarding lithotomy positioning during ureterorenoscopy. For radiological assessment, adults aged 18–65 who underwent DJ stent placement after ureteroscopy were analyzed using KUB X-rays obtained in supine and standard lithotomy positions. Distances between stent segments and lumbar vertebrae, as well as intersegmental angles, were measured and compared according to BMI. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Fifty-three urologists completed the survey. Most reported that psoas muscle length decreases (67.9%) and width increases (66%) in lithotomy position. The standard dorsal lithotomy position was preferred by 60.4%, and 62.3% believed positioning could affect ureteroscope passage at the iliac vessel crossover. Adjustable leg supports were routinely used by 84.9%. Increasing lithotomy level was not considered to significantly influence complication rates (69.8%), operative time (58.5%), or stone-free rates (62.3%). Among 22 radiologically evaluated patients (mean age 51.9 years, 64.6% male), no significant differences were found in stent–vertebra distances or segmental angles between positions, nor across BMI and gender groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although radiological analysis showed no measurable ureteral configuration changes, urologists perceive lithotomy positioning as potentially influential during endoscopic access. Further dynamic imaging and outcome-based studies are warranted to clarify its clinical significance.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient PositioningPsoas MusclesUreterUreteroscopyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiographyStentsUrologyYoung AdultLithotomyMinimally invasive stone surgeriesPsoas muscleUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41735539
PMCPMC12932263

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.