Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735552›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Explore the role of ctHPVDNA kinetics during diagnosis and follow-up of HPV OPSCC.

Flaminia Campo, Francesca Paolini, Federica Rossi, Eleonora Guido, Debora Cacciato, Antonello Vidiri, Fulvia Pimpinelli, Aldo Venuti, Raul Pellini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Flaminia CampoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy. flaminia.campo@ifo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9249-7573
Francesca PaoliniHPV- Unit, UOSD Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.
Federica RossiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.
Eleonora GuidoDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.
Debora CacciatoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.
Antonello VidiriDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.
Fulvia PimpinelliDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.
Aldo VenutiHPV- Unit, UOSD Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.
Raul PelliniDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary objective is to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of ctHPVDNA for diagnosis and recurrence. Secondary objectives include measuring the lead time between ctHPVDNA positivity and pathological recurrence.

methodsddPCR reactions were prepared with 2× ddPCR Supermix for Probes (No dUTP) (Bio-Rad) and assay-specific primers/probes targeting the E6/E7 region of HPV16, HPV33, and HPV35. Patients were included in the diagnosis cohort if they had at least one ctHPVDNA measurement obtained prior to the initiation of primary treatment. Patients were assigned to the surveillance cohort if they had at least one ctHPVDNA test performed following completion of definitive or salvage therapy.

resultsAt diagnosis test revealed in 167 patients a PPV of 98,5% (95% CI, 94,6%-99,8%) and NPP of 97,1% (95% CI, 85,1%-99,9%). At follow up, ctHPVDNA testing demonstrated in 165 patients PPV of 96,9% (95% CI, 84,3%-99,4% [31 of 32 tests]), and NPV of 100% (95% CI, 98,9%-100% [351 of 351 tests]). There was a median lead time of positive test to event (recurrence day) of 44 days (range, 0-343 days) and mean (SD) of 143 (167,8) days. When we consider only the 11 patients enrolled at the time of the first diagnosis and followed with serial blood sampling, the median lead time was 331 days (range, 23-393 days) and mean (SD) of 233 (156,7) days.

conclusionctHPVDNA represents a promising dynamic biomarker for diagnosis and Follow-up. Incorporation of ctHPVDNA kinetics into follow-up protocols may reduce reliance on frequent imaging, enabling a targeted follow-up strategy and allowing earlier detection of recurrence.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralHuman Papillomavirus VirusesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsDNA, ViralCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA)Follow upHead and neck cancerHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Liquid biopsyOropharynx squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.