ArticleBMC genomics2026
Filtering for truth: high-precision taxonomic classification in nanopore shotgun metagenomics data through a KMA-based bioinformatic pipeline (KAPTAIN).
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShotgun metagenomics enables to study microbial communities without biases from culturing and isolation, but taxonomic classification to the species level remains challenging due to high false positive rates. Oxford Nanopore Technologies offers new opportunities to address these challenges by producing longer reads. However, different pipelines and tools use different methods to reduce false positives, resulting in variable outcomes with limited exploration of what works best in practice. Relative abundance filtering is often used to improve precision by removing false positives but reduces also recall by removing true positives. In this study, we optimized a broadly applicable taxonomic classification pipeline for long-read nanopore sequencing data that improves precision. The pipeline uses the tool KMA as the underlying classifier, followed by specific post-processing and optimization of filtering thresholds. Based on ten defined mock communities, different filter thresholds were evaluated, alongside the effect of the sequencing yield and the limit of detection (LOD).
resultsOur optimized pipeline substantially outperformed default classifier settings, and the conventionally used relative abundance filtering. Classification accuracy improved with higher sequencing yields, requiring at least a post-filtering yield of 500M bases, and ideally 1000M bases, for reliable results. At yields above 1000M bases, median precision could be improved up to 95% while maintaining median recall at 91.62%. Further increasing median precision to 99% reduced recall to 79.08%. Similarly, higher sequencing yields lowered LOD. For yields above 1000 M bases, the limit of detection remained stable at 0.1% up to a median precision of 95%, while yields below 1000M showed an LOD of 1%. Validation on ten probiotic-derived mock communities confirmed the pipeline’s performance and general applicability.
conclusionOur optimized classification pipeline for nanopore sequencing data provides substantially higher precision compared to default approaches and is suitable for diverse metagenomic applications. We provide specific guidance on expected recall and precision values for minimum sequencing yields and their associated LODs. Our optimized pipeline, called KAPTAIN (KMA-bAsed Pipeline for meTAgenomic specIes ideNtification), is publicly available on GitHub ( https://github.com/BioinformaticsPlatformWIV-ISP/KAPTAIN ) and also the Galaxy instance of our institute ( https://galaxy.sciensano.be ) to be used by other scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.