Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735949›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Needlestick and sharps injuries and its preventive implications among cleaners in tertiary public hospitals, Ethiopia.

Sina Temesgen Tolera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sina Temesgen ToleraCollege of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O. Box: 235, Harar City, Ethiopia. sinatem3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6489-3923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital cleaners frequently get needle stick and sharps injuries (NSSIs), which are described as unintentional injuries brought on by various sharp objects, needles, scalpels, and glass slides, cutting through the skin while providing cleaning and managing medical care. However, there are fewer studies among these marginalized working groups than among other healthcare staffs.

objectiveThe study aimed to assess NSSIs, associated factors among hospital cleaners and preventive implications in eight selected tertiary public hospitals of eastern part of Ethiopia.

methodsA hospital-based Cross-sectional study design was conducted in eight selected tertiary public hospitals of eastern part of Ethiopia. The study period ranged from May 1st, 2023, to August 30th, 2023. The study’s source was all hospitals in eastern Ethiopia. From 8 tertiary hospitals, 342 cleaners were randomly selected. The prevalence of NSSIs among cleaners for the last 12 months was calculated using the single-proportion formula. Face-to-face data collection was conducted. To ensure the validity of the data, data collectors were trained, and standard and structured questionnaires were developed. The data were coded and exported into EpiData 3.1 before being exported to Stata 17. Hospital cleaners frequently get needle stick and sharps injuries (NSSIs), which are described as unintentional injuries brought on by various sharp objects, including needles, scalpels, and glass slides, cutting through the skin while providing medical care. The crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were displayed with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests were employed. Multicollinearity was tested using the variance inflation factor (VIF).

resultThe prevalence of acute NSSIs in the last 12 months among cleaners of tertiary government hospitals was 68.14% (95%CI:62.69,73,23%). The injured body parts were fingers, feet/toes, arms, and legs, which were shared by 46.68%, 26.50%, 17.67% and 14.20%, respectively. Multivariable logistic logistic shows that safety factors such as lack of occupational health and safety [OHS] training (AOR: 2.27; 95%CI: 1.09, 4.71), non-compliance of PPE (AOR: 2.00; 95%CI: 1.00,4.78), working more than 8 h hours per day (AOR: 4.12; 95%CI: 2.76, 9.45) were increased odds of NSSIs. Also, working at night (AOR: 2.21; 95%CI: 1.03, 4.72), job stress (AOR: 7.16; 95%CI: 4.23, 12.10), and workload (AOR: 6.84; 95%CI: 2.14, 21.83) increased the odds of NSSIs. Meanwhile, lack of supervision (AOR: 5.34; 95%CI: 2.54,8.87), lack of post-exposure prophylaxis service (AOR: 3.53; 95%CI: 1.01,6.78), and weak implementation of prevention and control service (AOR: 6.12; 95%CI: 3.56,16.87) increased the odds of NSSIs among hospital cleaners.

conclusionThere is still considerable public health concern about the prevalence of NSSIs among hospital cleaners. The main identified associated factors were lack of OHS training, working more than 8 h hours per day, job stress, workload, lack of supervision, lack of post-exposure prophylaxis service, and weak implementation of IPC service. Therefore, this study advised that safety procedures and the appropriate use of safety equipment, ongoing educational campaigns, and focused training programs are crucial to control the risk of NSSIs among these marginalized groups. In addition, the initial increase in NSSIs that was noted after safety measures were put in place emphasizes the need for ongoing education and practical training to guarantee that these features are used effectively.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PublicHousekeeping, HospitalNeedlestick InjuriesPersonnel, HospitalTertiary Care CentersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesEthiopiaHospital CleanersNeedle stick and Sharp InjuriesPreventive ImplicationTertiary hospitals

Identifiers

PMID41735949
PMCPMC13040942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.