SynthesisBMC medicine2026
Effectiveness of group-based art interventions for late-life depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is the most common mental health disorder among the older populations, leading to a higher reduction in quality of life and an increased financial burden on the health care system. One promising non-pharmacological approach for improving mental health in older adults is the use of art-based interventions.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined any form of art intervention (including music, dance, and visual arts) targeting depression in adults aged > 55 years. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library through July 2025. Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and determined study eligibility. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis, followed by subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and publication bias assessment (Egger's test and funnel plot).
resultsOut of the 41 RCTs reviewed, 37 report results from 23 of these studies and were eligible for meta-analysis, including a total of 3791 participants. In the pooled analysis, it was revealed that art-based interventions had a greater impact in lowering levels of depression as compared to their respective controls (SMD = - 0.93, 95% CI: - 1.19 to - 0.68, p < 0.001) and had a high degree of heterogeneity (I
conclusionsArt-based interventions effectively reduce depression in older adults and can serve as valuable complements to mental health strategies for aging populations. However, due to heterogeneous study designs and variable quality, additional high-quality trials are needed to confirm these benefits and optimize intervention delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.