SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Neuroprotective effects of icariin in animal models of depression and anxiety: a systematic review of preclinical studies.
Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Icariin, a major bioactive flavonoid extracted from Epimedium species, has demonstrated promising neuroprotective and antidepressant-like effects in preclinical research. However, the magnitude and consistency of these effects remain unclear due to substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the antidepressant efficacy of icariin in rodent models of depression. Literature searches were performed in Scopus, PubMed and Embase up to May 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Twenty-three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and thirteen provided sufficient data for quantitative analysis. icariin administration significantly improved anhedonia-like behavior in the sucrose preference test (SPT), with a pooled Hedges’ g of 2.26 (95% CI: 1.56–2.96), and markedly reduced immobility in the forced swim test (FST), with a pooled Hedges’ g of 3.64 (95% CI: 2.65–4.64), indicating strong and robust antidepressant-like effects. Both findings were comparable in magnitude to conventional antidepressants. Meta-regression revealed that longer duration of depression model induction was associated with stronger behavioral improvement, whereas dose did not significantly predict efficacy. Mechanistic evidence suggests that icariin acts through multi-target neuroprotective pathways, including enhancement of BDNF-mediated neuroplasticity, inhibition of neuroinflammation, and regulation of HPA-axis dysfunction. Although methodological variability, male-biased animal selection, and pharmacokinetic limitations were identified, the overall evidence supports icariin as a promising antidepressant candidate for further translational investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.