Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736024›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2026

Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians.

Guido Mazzinari, Fernando G Zampieri, Michael O Harhay, Marcus J Schultz, David M van Meenen, Ary Serpa-Neto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guido MazzinariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia, 46026, Spain. gmazzinari@gmail.com.
Fernando G ZampieriDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Michael O HarhayDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marcus J SchultzPROtective VEntilation Network.
David M van MeenenPROtective VEntilation Network.
Ary Serpa-NetoPROtective VEntilation Network.

Funding

Advancing the design, analysis, and interpretation of acute respiratory distress syndrome trials using modern statistical toolsR01HL168202 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Oscar Harhay, Fan Li · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL168202NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL168202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian methods offer an intuitive and coherent statistical framework for updating probabilistic beliefs by integrating prior knowledge-whether from existing data or expert consensus-with new evidence via likelihood functions to generate posterior probability distributions. This approach yields clinically meaningful outputs, such as credible intervals and probabilities of treatment benefit, and can incorporate thresholds relevant to practice, like the region of practical equivalence (ROPE). Recent advances in computation-including Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms, and probabilistic programming languages like Stan and JAGS- have made Bayesian approaches feasible even for complex hierarchical models. In perioperative medicine, these methods are particularly valuable for (1) complementing trial results by quantifying clinically important effects in the context of statistically nonsignificant findings or modest probabilities of benefit despite statistical significance, (2) enhancing meta-analyses through coherent integration of heterogeneous studies and sparse data, and (3) enabling adaptive and platform trial designs through continuous evidence synthesis. The ability to incorporate informative priors can complement existing knowledge, especially in small-sample studies, which are common in perioperative medicine, where traditional approaches provide insufficient precision. Although concerns remain regarding subjectivity in prior specification, these are increasingly addressed through structured guidelines, benchmark priors, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses. Altogether, Bayesian methods provide a flexible and powerful alternative for generating actionable insights in complex clinical settings, including in perioperative care.

Identifiers

PMID41736024
PMCPMC13037322

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.