ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Psychosocial interventions for depression and anxiety for female adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for the systematic literature review and lived experience synthesis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression and anxiety are common mental health problems among female adolescents worldwide, with higher prevalence rates in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Existing reviews indicate that psychosocial interventions can reduce depression and anxiety in adolescents in SSA. However, no review has been conducted to examine the effectiveness of these interventions for female adolescents specifically. AIM(S): The primary aim of this study is to systematically review psychosocial interventions for depression and anxiety among female adolescents in SSA. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A systematic search will be conducted across eight electronic databases-Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and Web of Science-to identify studies that meet the eligibility criteria. The study selection process will follow the PRISMA guidelines, and will be conducted in Covidence. The quality of the selected studies will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A meta-analysis and narrative synthesis will be applied to the included studies. To complement the findings of the systematic literature review, the lived experience synthesis will be conducted. We will consult the Youth Advisory Group (YAG) composed of up to 10 young females with lived experience of depression and/or anxiety from SSA to get their perspectives, views, and suggestions on the results and dissemination of the prospective systematic review findings. DISCUSSION: Findings from the review will inform government policies addressing female adolescent mental health problems in Sub-Saharan Africa. It will also inform future research by identifying gaps regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for female adolescents.
conclusionGiven the existing gender differences in adolescent mental health, it is imperative to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions specifically for female adolescents. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251059110.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.