Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736252›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2026

Supporting Podiatric Medicine Education Through Tailored Work Allocation Models.

A Coda, A Fellas, C Escalona-Marfil, X Ruiz-Tarrazo, X Ortas, X Girones, F Hawke

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A CodaSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing-The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
A FellasSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing-The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1557-6232
C Escalona-MarfilFaculty of Health Sciences at Manresa, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Manresa, Spain.
X Ruiz-TarrazoFaculty of Health Sciences at Manresa, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Manresa, Spain.
X OrtasFaculty of Health Sciences at Manresa, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Manresa, Spain.
X GironesResearch and Innovation, Healthcare Consortium, Terrassa, Spain.
F HawkeSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing-The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary explores the necessity of tailored work allocation models in podiatric medicine education to meet the unique demands of clinical programmes. It highlights the importance of maintaining optimal student-to-staff ratios, the impact on student development, programme reputation and addressing the national workforce shortage in podiatry.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPodiatryHumansclinical educationpodiatric medicinestudent‐to‐staff ratiowork allocation modelsworkforce shortage

Identifiers

PMID41736252
PMCPMC12932302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.