ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026
Level of health technology assessment process-related skills among doctors in Croatia: a cross-sectional survey study.
Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe European Union's Health Technology Assessment Regulation (HTAR) and its implementing acts foresee various forms of clinician involvement, such as joint clinical assessment or Joint Scientific Consultation. However, considering the varying preparedness levels for HTAR, as well as the understanding of the health technology assessment (HTA) principles and processes, this study aimed to evaluate the levels of HTA-related skills among medical and dental doctors in Croatia.
methodsA cross-sectional survey study was conducted among medical and dental medicine doctors in Croatia. The survey recorded respondents' relevant experience with HTA processes along with skill levels across the entire HTA process, mainly for acting as individual clinical experts or on behalf of their professional organizations, as well as potential HTA doers. Skill levels were evaluated using a 5-point scale (1 -
resultsAmong the 376 respondents included, only 6.1 percent had previous involvement in HTA, and 2.2 percent were familiar with HTAR. Related to the HTA process, the highest scores were observed in the understanding of key concepts and results of searching for studies, critical appraisal, study synthesis preparation, and ethics. The lowest scores were recorded in health economics, evidence grading, qualitative synthesis, and public/patient involvement. Respondents with prior research experience and those who reported frequent research use had significantly higher HTA skill scores.
conclusionsA significant gap in HTA-related skills highlights the need for targeted professional development programs and long-term educational reforms to build the capacity for various modes of involvement in HTA processes and their implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.