Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736804›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2026

Convergence and divergence of molecular mechanisms in Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity.

Kira M Feighan, Harshit K Thakare, Stephen D Glasgow, Timothy E Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kira M FeighanDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Harshit K ThakareDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Stephen D GlasgowDepartment of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Timothy E KennedyDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The umbrella of synaptic plasticity includes associative, activity-dependent alterations in synaptic strength that are thought to underlie learning and memory, and negative feedback that stabilizes network activity, termed Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity, respectively. These forms of plasticity respond to activity oppositely, and on different spatial and temporal scales. However, despite these fundamental differences, many similar molecular mechanisms are engaged by each form of plasticity to alter synaptic strength. Here, we review molecular mechanisms involved in homeostatic plasticity and compare their involvement in Hebbian plasticity. We focus on synaptic scaling, long-term potentiation, and long-term depression, which are mediated by regulation of post-synaptic amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate-type glutamate receptor (AMPARs) accumulation. Addressing synaptic scaffolding, intracellular signaling, cell-adhesion, and secreted factors, we identify mechanisms that appear to be convergent, differentially engaged, and divergent that uniquely regulate homeostatic scaling. These comparisons identify clear gaps to be addressed by future studies that aim to parse the contributions of Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity to regulate AMPAR function.

Indexed as

AMPAR traffickingHebbian plasticityhomeostatic scalinglong-term depressionlong-term potentiation

Identifiers

PMID41736804
PMCPMC12926376

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.