Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737038›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026

GelMA-Based Nanocomposites for Bone Defect Regeneration: Design, Performance, and Clinical Translation Potential.

Guang Li, Yan Wang, Dong Wang, Hongwei Cui, Mengran Qin, Jianxiong Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guang Li *Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Yan Wang *Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Dong WangTianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Hongwei CuiTianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Mengran QinTianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Jianxiong MaTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-5641-9760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review summarizes recent advances in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based nanocomposites for bone defect regeneration, addressing the persistent clinical need for effective and customizable bone repair strategies. As an extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimicking hydrogel, GelMA offers favourable biocompatibility, tunable mechanics, and photo-crosslinkability, enabling integration with light-based 3D printing platforms to fabricate patient-specific scaffolds and, more recently, skeletal organoid-inspired constructs. Nevertheless, key barriers to translational advancement remain, including limited load-bearing capacity without reinforcement, insufficient vascularization, lack of intrinsic antibacterial activity, and a shortage of large-animal validation and well-designed clinical trials. We synthesize how formulation and processing parameters translate into scaffold properties and biological outcomes, and we discuss representative optimization strategies-such as composite reinforcement with hydroxyapatite/bioglass, bioactive molecule delivery, and immunomodulatory design-to address these limitations. We further highlight application-oriented evidence across major bone-loss-related conditions and summarize practical translational bottlenecks, including batch-to-batch reproducibility, scalable, GMP-compliant pathways that may be required, sterilization compatibility, and the need to synchronize degradation kinetics with new bone formation. By integrating material design, mechanistic considerations, and translational constraints, this review provides a framework to guide the rational development of GelMA-based systems toward clinically relevant bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationGelatinMethacrylatesNanocompositesAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTranslational Research, BiomedicalBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesGelatingelatin methacryloylMethacrylates3D printingbone defectbone regenerationGelMA

Identifiers

PMID41737038
PMCPMC12927856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.