ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Patients' Perspectives on the Role of General Practice-Based Pharmacists: A Focus Group Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An aging population, increasingly complex health conditions, and high workloads in primary care highlight the need for more efficient healthcare organisation. Integrating pharmacists into general practice can improve pharmacotherapeutic care and reduce hospital admissions. In the Netherlands, this collaborative model is being explored for broader implementation. Limited research has examined how patients perceive the role of pharmacists within general practice settings. Aim: What are the perspectives of patients using chronic medications on the role of general practice-based pharmacists?. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study using focus group interviews was conducted with patients from five health centers in the Netherlands. Between May and September 2024 five focus groups were held: two with patients who had experience with pharmacist services in general practice, three with inexperienced patients. The inclusion criterion was the use of at least one medication on a chronic basis; no exclusion criteria were applied. An independent patient representative moderated the session, using a semi-structured topic guide. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis in NVivo 12. Results: A total of 31 patients participated, with five to eight in each group. Patients recognised and trusted general practice-based pharmacists for their expertise in complex pharmacotherapy, clear role distinction from GPs and community pharmacists, and strong communication skills. Key enablers of trust included secure data handling, adequate funding, and accessibility. Pharmacists were valued for delivering personalised, proactive care, contributing to multidisciplinary networks, and reducing GP workload. It was also suggested that a pharmacist working across both community pharmacy and general practice may offer added value, though this hybrid role could potentially lead to fragmented care. Conclusion: Overall, patients perceived the role of the general practice-based pharmacist as a valuable addition to primary care, particularly in the management of complex medication regimens. Trust in the pharmacist's new role and clear delineation of responsibilities between health care professionals are crucial for success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.