ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
Comparative efficacy of tDCS and tACS in the context of enhancing executive function under acute stress: A randomized, sham-controlled study.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute stress impairs executive function and prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a promising approach to the task of mitigating these deficits. This study directly compared the efficacy of two tES techniques-transcranial direct (tDCS) and alternating current (tACS) stimulation-targeting the left dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) in terms of protecting executive functions under stress and potential neural mechanisms. Methods: In a randomized, participant-blinded, sham-controlled study, 110 healthy male undergraduates (18-25 years) received active tDCS, tACS, or sham stimulation before stress induction via the Trier Social Stress Test for Groups. Executive function was assessed using 3-back, Go/no-go, Stroop, and task-switching paradigms, and prefrontal hemodynamics were recorded with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Results: Stress induction was successfully maintained throughout the testing period. Compared with both the tACS and sham groups, the tDCS group exhibited greater working memory (3-back) accuracy. Compared with the sham group, both tES groups exhibited enhanced response inhibition (Go/no-go). Neuroimaging revealed lower left DLPFC activation during the 3-back, Go/no-go, and Stroop tasks in the tES groups, in which context tDCS was characterized by the lowest activation during cognitive inhibition. During task switching, both tES groups exhibited elevated activation in the right pre-supplementary motor area. Conclusions: Both tDCS and tACS enhance performance in specific executive domains (working memory and response inhibition) under acute stress and demonstrate a pattern of lower prefrontal activation, consistent with the concept of improved neural efficiency. Among them, tDCS offers superior benefits. These findings establish a foundation for efforts to optimize tES-based interventions to support cognitive resilience in real-world acute-stress settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.