ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026
Strategic purchasing of oncology drugs to improve affordability and access to cancer care in India.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is a leading driver of catastrophic health expenditure in India, where medicines constitute more than 60% of out-of-pocket expenditure. Fragmented procurement, inefficient supply chains, market-based pricing, and limited public coverage of novel high-cost therapies exacerbate inequities in access and affordability. To address these challenges, we propose a unified strategic purchasing agenda for cancer medicines in India built on two mutually reinforcing pillars. The first pillar, pooled procurement, aims to reduce prices and correct fragmentation for off-patent and widely used oncology drugs, thereby lowering OOPE and improving availability in both public and empanelled private facilities. Global as well as national level models of pooled procurement have illustrated the gains achievable through collective bargaining, demand consolidation, and transparent processes. Complementing this, the second pillar, value-based pricing, seeks to align the prices of high-cost, often patented therapies with their incremental clinical and societal value, through systematic use of HTA and, where feasible, managed entry agreements and reimbursement reforms. Together, these mechanisms offer a complementary pathway to mitigate financial toxicity and strengthen progress toward Universal Health Coverage in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.