Evidence mapPaperPMID 41737362Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

Strategic purchasing of oncology drugs to improve affordability and access to cancer care in India.

Maulik Chokshi, Oshia Garg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maulik ChokshiGlobal Director, Health Systems Research and Policy, ACCESS Health International, Inc, 9/2, Nehru Enclave East, Kalkaji Extension, 110019, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Oshia GargResearch Associate (Research and Policy), ACCESS Health International, Inc, New Delhi, A-24, New RK Colony, 33 Foot Road, 136027, Kaithal, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a leading driver of catastrophic health expenditure in India, where medicines constitute more than 60% of out-of-pocket expenditure. Fragmented procurement, inefficient supply chains, market-based pricing, and limited public coverage of novel high-cost therapies exacerbate inequities in access and affordability. To address these challenges, we propose a unified strategic purchasing agenda for cancer medicines in India built on two mutually reinforcing pillars. The first pillar, pooled procurement, aims to reduce prices and correct fragmentation for off-patent and widely used oncology drugs, thereby lowering OOPE and improving availability in both public and empanelled private facilities. Global as well as national level models of pooled procurement have illustrated the gains achievable through collective bargaining, demand consolidation, and transparent processes. Complementing this, the second pillar, value-based pricing, seeks to align the prices of high-cost, often patented therapies with their incremental clinical and societal value, through systematic use of HTA and, where feasible, managed entry agreements and reimbursement reforms. Together, these mechanisms offer a complementary pathway to mitigate financial toxicity and strengthen progress toward Universal Health Coverage in India.

Indexed as

Cancer careFinancial toxicityOncology medicinesPooled procurementStrategic purchasingValue-based pricing

Identifiers

PMID41737362
PMCPMC12926028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.