ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Intestinal Rehabilitation Plan for Patients with Colorectal Cancer During the Perioperative Period: An Evidence Synthesis.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic potential and mechanisms of rehabilitation interventions in preventing cancer metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize the best available evidence regarding perioperative intestinal rehabilitation programs for patients with colorectal cancer, and to provide a reference for clinical nursing practice. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in BMJ Best Practice, GIN, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Medline (via PubMed), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), and the Chinese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition of the Chinese Medical Association. The search encompassed clinical guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, expert consensus statements, and other relevant evidence pertaining to intestinal management in patients following colorectal cancer surgery. The retrieval period spanned from the inception of each database to August 2025. Two researchers with training in evidence-based practice independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, followed by data extraction and thematic synthesis of the evidence. Results: A total of 16 articles were included, comprising 2 guidelines, 9 systematic reviews, 3 evidence summaries, and 2 expert consensus documents. The evidence was synthesized across six domains: preoperative nutritional management, prehabilitation and bowel preparation, intraoperative surgical management, postoperative nutritional support, postoperative mobility management, and management of drains and symptoms. A total of 23 evidence-based recommendations were identified and summarized. Conclusion: This study synthesizes the current evidence regarding intestinal rehabilitation programs for patients with colorectal cancer during the perioperative period. Nursing professionals should critically evaluate clinical contexts, apply evidence-based practices, and develop scientifically sound, individualized intestinal rehabilitation protocols. Such an approach supports the advancement of a nursing-led, multidisciplinary model of personalized rehabilitation, thereby enhancing both nursing quality and patient recovery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.