ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Divide or Compensatory Dividend? The Longitudinal Impact of Smart Health Monitoring on Intrinsic Capacity Trajectories.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Health equity and public acceptance of large language models in healthcare in China: A national population-based survey.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Cultural Determinants of Assistive Health Technology Acceptance in Asian Older Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review with Evidence Predominantly from East Asia.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Digital health technologies, as an integral component of age-friendly home modifications in rural China, provide a promising pathway to address the challenges of population aging. However, a Methods: This study employed a focused ethnographic approach, informed by the constant comparative method of grounded theory. Intensive fieldwork was undertaken from June to December 2024. Data were generated through participant observation and semi-structured interviews and subsequently analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Within the context of age-friendly home modifications among older adults in rural China, the Conclusion: Within the framework of age-friendly home modifications for older adults in rural China, the application of digital health technologies must transcend the narrow assumption that access alone guarantees use, shifting instead toward a comprehensive perspective that spans the continuum from access to effective utilization. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.