ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Pregnant women's knowledge, attitudes, and practices on food safety: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregnant women are physiologically more vulnerable to foodborne diseases because immune, hormonal, and metabolic changes reduce resistance to pathogens and increase the severity of dehydration and its fetal consequences. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of pregnant women regarding food safety. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 216 pregnant women attending Family Health Centers in Bitlis, Türkiye. Data were collected using a structured and validated questionnaire consisting of sections on socio-demographic characteristics, pregnancy-related factors, food safety knowledge (20 items), attitudes (18 items), and practices (11 items). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and non-parametric group comparisons. Results: While general hygiene awareness was high (e.g., washing fruits/vegetables: 98.6%), knowledge of specific pathogens Conclusion: Although pregnant women demonstrated positive attitudes and adequate general hygiene knowledge, gaps in pathogen-specific knowledge and several unsafe household practices persist. Antenatal education should prioritize clarifying true risk factors, correcting widespread misinformation, and reinforcing practical skills to promote safer food behaviors during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.