ReviewAnalytical science advances2026
Advances in Eco-Friendly Extraction of Fruit Bioactive Compounds: Technologies, Challenges and Future Directions.
Review in Analytical science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valorization of Vegetable Processing Residues for Functional Biodegradable Films in Sustainable Food Packaging.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sustainable Discovery of Natural Anti-Aging Bioactives from Food Resources: Current Status and Machine Learning Perspectives.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Advanced Sustainable Approaches for the Valorization of High-Value Bioactive Compounds from Agro-Industrial Waste: Challenges and Opportunities.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruit bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, carotenoids, vitamins and fibres provide important antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and disease-preventive benefits, but their extraction remains difficult due to poor solubility and the limitations of conventional methods that use toxic solvents, require high energy and often result in low yields. This review systematically examines both traditional and advanced extraction technologies, including membrane filtration, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), pressurized liquid extraction, chromatographic techniques, micro- and nano-separation and enzyme-assisted processes, drawing on peer-reviewed English literature from databases like Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed and Google Scholar using terms related to eco-friendly extraction, fruit bioactive compounds and technologies such as ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), SFE and natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES), supplemented by screening reference lists. Peer-reviewed studies on green extraction methods, solvents, optimization strategies and sustainability were included, whereas non-fruit matrices, insufficiently detailed studies and non-peer-reviewed sources were excluded. Publications from January 2017 to October 2025 were retrieved and considered, with key earlier studies added as needed. The search retrieved about 1203 records; after duplicate removal and independent screening by two reviewers, 456 eligible studies were retained for analysis. Emphasis is placed on eco-friendly methods that maintain compound integrity and enable industrial scalability, alongside discussions of green chemistry, fruit by-product valorization and circular economy strategies. Technologies are assessed for efficiency, selectivity, environmental impact and cost-effectiveness, with applications spanning functional foods, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and packaging. Despite challenges such as compound stability, regulatory barriers and the need for specialized expertise, emerging hybrid systems and AI-driven process modelling show promise in optimizing extraction and reducing costs. Future research should focus on developing multifunctional green solvents, real-time monitoring tools and closed-loop systems to minimize waste and energy use, ultimately advancing sustainable bioactive extraction and contributing to healthier, more environmentally conscious industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.