SynthesisNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
Assessing the causal effects of environmental tobacco smoke exposure: a meta-analytic Mendelian randomization study.
Synthesis in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methodological approaches, challenges, and opportunities in the application of Mendelian randomisation to lifecourse epidemiology: A systematic literature review.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- Extending the Use of Mendelian Randomisation With Non-Inherited Variants to Assess Socially Transmitted Parental Exposures Under Assortative Mating.Genetic epidemiology · 2026Article
- Woolf et al's "GWAS by subtraction" is not useful for cross-generational Mendelian randomization studies.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- MRSamePopTest: introducing a simple falsification test for the two-sample mendelian randomisation 'same population' assumption.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- The UK BiLEVE and Mendelian randomisation: using multivariable instrumental variables to address "damned if you, damned if you don't" adjustment problems.BMC research notes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFirst-hand smoking is a major cause of global morbidity and mortality. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS; "second-hand" or "passive smoking") may also cause ill health, but establishing ETS as the cause is challenging, in part due to confounding and reverse causation.
methodsWe applied Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal effects of ETS. We use four approaches to instrument ETS exposure: The first and second used an index individual's parent's genetically predicted smoking, independent of the index individual's genetically predicted smoking to assess the effects of that parent's smoking on the index individual. The third and fourth used one index individual's parent's genetically predicted smoking, independent of the other parent's genetically predicted smoking to assess the effects of the first parent's smoking on the second parent. We then meta-analyze the four MR approaches.
resultsOur findings suggest a causal effect of genetically predicted ETS exposure on lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PFDR < .001 for both). We did not find evidence supporting an effect on hypertension, depression, coronary heart disease, or stroke (PFDR = 1.000 for all four non-respiratory outcomes).
conclusionThese results support existing public health measures to limit exposure to ETS. IMPLICATIONS: We assess the causal effects of environmental tobacco smoking (ETS; "second-hand smoking" or "passive smoking") using a quasi-experimental method, Mendelian randomization, which is more robust to confounding than conventional epidemiological methods.To study the effects of ETS exposure, we used an index individual's parent's or spouses' genetically predicted smoking, independent of either the index's or the other parent's genetically predicted smoking when assessing the effect of that parent's smoking on the index individual or other parent, respectively. We then meta-analyze the effects of different relatives.This study extends the Mendelian randomization paradigm to assess ETS by examining the effect that one relative has on the other relative, independent of the other relative's smoking. In doing so, it adds a unique source of evidence that triangulates with prior research to indicate an effect of ETS exposure on lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.