ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
The longitudinal relationship between interoceptive sensibility and self-management behavior in stroke patients: a cross-lagged panel network analysis.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNetwork modeling is considered an effective method for elucidating the complex relationships between emotional states and their symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the dynamic interaction between interoceptive sensibility and self-management behavior over time in patients with stroke, using longitudinal and cross-lagged network analyses.
methodsData were obtained from three follow-up records of 417 patients with stroke at a tertiary hospital in XX City between July 2024 and June 2025. The Self-Management Behavior Scale and the Multidimensional Intrasensory Awareness Assessment Scale were used to evaluate patients' self-management behavior and interoceptive sensibility, respectively. Symptom-level interactions at each time point were analyzed using network analysis, and cross-lagged panel network analysis was used to investigate the temporal dynamics and bidirectional relationship between interoceptive sensibility and self-management behavior.
resultsNetwork analysis revealed that the number of nonzero connections at time points T1, T2, and T3 was 62, 29, and 17, respectively. The core symptom "attention regulation" (IS4) was consistently and significantly stronger than the other symptoms. The key roles were determined using the cross-lagged symptom network analysis. In T1-T2, "trust" (IS8) was the most predictive variable. "Trust" (IS8) and "body listening" (IS7), "social and interpersonal management" (SEM7), and "daily life management" (SEM6) formed a negative feedback loop. In T2-T3, "Trust" (IS8) is the most predictive, positively associated with "worrying" (IS3), "social and interpersonal management" (SEM7), and "noticing" (IS1). It indirectly affects "disease management" (SEM1) via IS3. In T1-T3, "social and interpersonal management" (SEM7) was the most predictive, associated with "diet management" (SEM3), and indirectly affects "self-regulation" (IS6) and "attention regulation" (IS4) via SEM3.
conclusionThis study identified a dynamic bidirectional association between self-management behavior and interoceptive sensibility in patients with stroke, providing an important reference for the development of targeted interventions and public health strategies to improve self-management behavior in patients with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.