ArticlemBio2026
Re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with increased antibody breadth and potency against diverse sarbecovirus strains.
Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A designed overlapping variant immunogen pool elicits broad sarbecovirus neutralization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Determinants of natural killer cell-mediated antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity in SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ease with which emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralizing antibodies limits the protection afforded by a prior exposure, be it infection or vaccination. While rare, broadly neutralizing antibodies with activity toward diverse sarbecoviruses have been detected in convalescent serum. Motivated by findings that plasma responses show increased neutralization breadth and potency with continued antigen exposure, we isolated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) after a SARS-CoV-2 re-infection and compared them to those isolated 1 year prior, after the first breakthrough infection. Among clonal lineage members identified at both time points, mAbs from the later time point showed improved neutralization potency and breadth. One mAb isolated after re-infection, C68.490, targets a conserved region in the receptor binding domain and shows remarkable activity not only against SARS-CoV-2 variants, but also diverse sarbecoviruses from more distant clades present in animal reservoirs. These findings suggest that a focus on individuals with diverse and repeated antigen exposure could lead to the identification of antibodies with therapeutic utility not just toward current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants, but also distant sarbecoviruses in the event of a future spillover.IMPORTANCESpillover of SARS-related viruses (sarbecoviruses) from animal reservoirs into humans has occurred multiple times in the past few decades. The most recent spillover due to SARS-CoV-2 continues to cause significant disease burden, and treatment options are few, in part because of selection for new variants due to immune escape. Thus, discovering antibodies that can block infection with sarbecoviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 variants, remains critical for both the current pandemic as well as those to come. Our study shows that an individual who was vaccinated and then had repeated breakthrough infections with distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants generated more potent antibodies after the second infection compared to the first infection. Notably, we discovered an antibody in this individual that not only neutralized the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants but also a range of diverse sarbecoviruses present in animal reservoirs. This antibody thus holds promise as a therapeutic for both the current pandemic and future spillover events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.