Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Effects of different exercise training programs on post-exercise [Formula: see text]O
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Exercise Training on Left Ventricular Function in Patients Post Myocardial Infarction: The EXercise Interval Training - V Study
The Effects of High-intensity Interval Training on Maximal Oxygen Uptake and Autonomic Nervous System in Patients With Post-acute Coronary Syndrome
The Effects of Periodization Training on Physiological Parameters, Cerebral Oxygenation, Cognitive Functions and Cardiac Remodelling in Coronary Patients.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated heart rate and oxygen uptake recovery phenotypes reveal heterogeneous recovery patterns in coronary artery disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOxygen deficit (O2 deficit) and post-exercise oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2) recovery responses are clinical prognostic markers in cardiac patients but have not been studied after exercise training in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). We aimed to compare the effects of different modalities of exercise training on O2 deficit and post-exercise [Formula: see text]O2 responses in CHD patients.
methodsFrom a pooled analysis of three randomised control trial, patients with CHD were trained with moderate-intensity continuous exercise training (MICET), low volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT), or combined MICET/HIIT for 12 weeks. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) parameters were assessed, and key exercise variables were calculated during and after exercise. O2 deficit, CPET post-exercise kinetics time constant for oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2), carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]CO2), minute ventilation ([Formula: see text]E) and heart rate (τHR), O2 debt and [Formula: see text]O2 recovery delay (RD) were calculated before and after training.
resultsA significant training effect for [Formula: see text]O2 (p < 0.05) was shown for all groups. Shorter [Formula: see text]O2 values with small effect size (ES from 0.21 to 0.4) were noted for the combined MICET/HIIT and MICET groups. A significant training effect (p < 0.01) was noted for O2 debt that was increased after training (ES: 0.1 to 0.47). No significant statistical effect was shown for [Formula: see text]O2 RD and [Formula: see text]CO2, [Formula: see text]E, τHR and O2 deficit in all groups.
conclusionsIn patients with CHD, exercise training improved post-exercise [Formula: see text]O2 kinetic and the O2 debt, with a higher impact of exercise dose (combined MICET/HIIT). Exercise training did not improve the [Formula: see text]O2 RD or the recovery time constant value of other cardiorespiratory parameters in CHD patients.
trial registrationNCT03414996, NCT02048696, NCT03443193.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41739167What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.