Evidence mapPaperPMID 41739204Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026

Artificial intelligence in pediatric nephrology: current applications and emerging frameworks for evidence generation.

Giovanni Pellegrino, Giovanni F M Strippoli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giovanni PellegrinoDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Giovanni F M StrippoliDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. gfmstrippoli@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming many areas of medicine. Pediatric nephrology may be a field of particular relevance due to its data-rich environments, rarity of diseases, long-term follow-up needs, and persistent evidence gaps. Traditional clinical research methods, including randomized controlled trials, are often difficult to conduct in pediatric nephrology because of small sample sizes, ethical constraints, heterogeneity of disease, and long latency to clinically meaningful outcomes. AI-based methods offer complementary approaches to address these challenges, spanning diagnostic support, prognostic modeling, imaging analysis, treatment personalization, and innovative frameworks for evidence generation. This narrative review provides a focused overview of AI applications that are already available or emerging in pediatric nephrology, integrating lessons from broader nephrology research on real-world data and digital-twin technologies. We refer to established and near-term applications in chronic kidney disease, dialysis, transplantation, imaging, pathology, and genomics in children. We then discuss future directions, including AI-enabled virtual trials and digital twins as potential tools to extend evidence to pediatric populations traditionally excluded from trials. Ethical, regulatory, and equity considerations specific to children are highlighted. We conclude that AI should be viewed as an adjunct, rather than a replacement to conventional clinical research, with particular promise for advancing precision, inclusivity, and timeliness of evidence in pediatric nephrology.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChronic kidney diseaseDialysisDigital twinsMachine learningPediatric nephrologyTransplantation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.